Jul 21, 2016 · Once that happens, code will resume execution at the "catch". If there is a breakpoint within a function that's evaluated as part of a "when", that breakpoint will suspend …

22 If there is a hierarchy of exceptions you can use the base class to catch all subclasses of exceptions. In the degenerate case you can catch all Java exceptions with:

I recommend using catch(Exception ex) when you plan to reuse the exception variable only, and catch (alone) in other cases. Just a matter of style for the second use case, but if personally …

If you re-throw an exception within the catch block, and that exception is caught inside of another catch block, everything executes according to the documentation.

try { WebId = new Guid(queryString["web"]); } catch (FormatException) { WebId = Guid.Empty; } catch (OverflowException) { WebId = Guid.Empty; } Is there a way to catch both exceptions …

The third try-catch block is different. When it throws the exception, it will change the source and the stack trace, so that it will appear that the exception has been thrown from this method, …

Jun 26, 2012 · catch (Exception e, ExtendsRuntimeException re) { // common logic to handle both exceptions } Is it possible to avoid duplicating the handler code in each catch block?

May 18, 2010 · Finally and catch blocks are quite different: Within the catch block you can respond to the thrown exception. This block is executed only if there is an unhandled …

Nope, (or ) is 's friend and always there as part of try/catch. However, it is perfectly valid to have them empty, like in your example. In the comments in your example code (If func1 throws …

I think that this only works if you raise and then catch the exception, but not if you try getting the traceback before raising an exception object that you create, which you might want to do in …